Facebook tries to “black box” application developers, gets massive pushback.
This past week a large portion of the Facebook population re-posted a phony status about Facebook’s privacy settings. Besides the false content, the status claimed that you could stop Facebook from taking your user information and “protect” your data by simply posting a status. Much of the data gathered from Facebook users is used for advertising purposes, giving Facebook a large amount of power in terms of advertising. The billion-dollar social media giant has an estimated 1.5 billion monthly users, making the demographic data extremely favorable for advertisers. Facebook recently made the advertising headlines for their power play in the app market (mobiledevmemo). In May, Facebook announced that it would be making changes to the policies around device level user data on applications (AdExchanger). The first change was to cease passing device-level campaign data back to the application owner. Facebook claimed that not providing user data from downloaded apps would somehow lead to more installs and reduce and/or eliminate privacy abuse.
Facebook's second change was going to allow publishers to access their lifetime value (LTV) and cohort (demographic group) calculations only if they turned over large portions of their organic search data to Facebook (VentureBeat.com). Here is an example: Candy Crush receives approximately 1,200 installations a day with 600 of them coming from Facebook, while the other 600 installs come from organic clicks (non-Facebook locations). Under Facebook's changes, the user IDs associated with the 600 non-Facebook installs would have been handed over to Facebook in exchange for post-install data. That means the advertiser would not be allowed to see the user results of the ads they paid for on Facebook, unless they handed over all data from the app publisher. Once publishers became informed of the changes to Facebook, their reactions were not at all what Facebook was looking for (VentureBeat.com).
The original date for these changes was to take place on August 20th, 2015, but because some of the top developers were pushing back, Facebook decided to delay the implementation until November 4th. Facebook hoped by delaying, that the additional time would have been enough to convince both advertisers and developers. In July, Facebook released a statement that stated that they would not require those who advertise with them to turn over user information, and never would (VentureBeat.com). This still didn’t sit well with the advertiser and publisher community. As time went on, Facebook failed to present why less information being delivered to advertisers and app publishers, with all information being delivered to Facebook, was a good thing for anyone other than Facebook.On August 4th, Facebook decided to ditch this plan altogether. Why? Because advertisers were given little explanation on why a massive power grab from Facebook was going to benefit them. Many application publishers rely on device level data to determine whether their campaign was successful or not, based on user information like gender and age. And with over 30 million applications that use Facebook’s app platform, the backlash was massive (DMS).
This posed a great question: Why would Facebook attempt to obtain device level data? Multiple publishers believe that this was a power move by Facebook to start handling the measurement of mobile data “internally” versus externally so they could create a new metric for determining the success or failure of a campaign. This might be the case, but it’s concerning to think that an app developer would be required to turn over their own data to Facebook in order to get data about their own published application.
This is another reason why El Toro is opposed to “metrics of success.” The hard truth is that the only “metric of success” is success. Your campaign is either successful, or it’s not. Facebook was trying to improve the way we look at advertising success of a campaign, but they went about it with poor planning.
Quality Over Quantity – Advertise On The Right Platforms.
Social media platforms come and go. Social media ad spending in the U.S has jumped $6.3 billion from last year and is projected to reach $88.3 billion in 2026. While these are impressive forecasts, only...
How To Build Advertising Resonance And Prevent Creative Fatigue
Does your brand resonate with customers? When marketers think about resonance, they do it through the lenses of brand resonance. Brand resonance refers to how a customer thinks and feels about your product or service....
Win The Race Before It Starts – Political Best Practices
El Toro is your non-partisan political advertising outlet. Data drives every decision in the win-or-go-home world of political advertising. With American politics as competitive as ever, how can your campaign strategy utilize data and successfully...
Everything You Want To Know About Cookies But Are Too Afraid To Ask
The digital world is transitioning towards a cookieless future, leaving professionals with burning questions about the new advertising technologies replacing third-party cookies. There’s no need to worry. El Toro can answer everything you want and...
Ready to Run With the Bull?Contact Us